Homebrew interest check, [b] When the Dragons Ruled[ / b]

[DM waz up?]

This is a champaign I'm thinking of where your characters are bonded to a dragon as a child. A whole dragon rider thing happening. I may/ may not actually get one up. It depends upon whether people find interest and if I get good feedback. I'm going to fit the dragons into a less element based (they all breath fire and resist fire) version. The players can also choose not to have a dragon for some other benefit that equals having a horse sized fire breathing lizard.

[Brandon Dellmen]

mmm sounds interesting. so I'm guessing classes with mount/compaion/familiars would be recomended?

[bigrig107]

Would the overall theme be a particular alignment, good or evil?

Definitely interested either way.

[DM waz up?]

Well, classes will actually be limited. Mostly non-spellcaster.

Spell casters can play, but they will be the ones without dragons

The overall alignment is neutral. It may lean towards one end of the pole or the other.

[The Dragon]

Would these be homebrew dragons or standard dragons?

[david barker]

Count me in

[CampinCarl9127]

Dragonrider

[Billybrainpan]

Sounds interesting

[Philo Pharynx]

I'm interested. What level were you thinking?

[Aidan Duncan]

I'm definitely interested. What rules for chargen?

[Arcanic Drake]

CampinCarl9127 wrote:

Dragonrider

Exactly. Its well rounded at least.

[Philo Pharynx]

I'd prefer that the dragon be a separate benefit instead of a class feature. If it's a class feature then we'll have a lot of similar characters. Of course if it's a gestalt game then we can all be dragonriders with something else.

Looking over the dragonrider, I'm not a fan of how they did it. I'm not sure why they get three favored saves. Plus the focus system seem to imply that for some choices you will be playing a dragon that happens to have a human-shaped backpack.

[The Dragon]

I've written the OP, this game won't be happening.